AIM: To explore the expression and clinicopathological significance of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and microvessel density (MVD) in gastric carcinogenesis, and to investigate their roles in the invasion and the relationship between biological behaviors and prognosis of gastric cancer. METHODS: Using Envision immunohistochemistry, COX-2 and CD34 expressions in gastric cancer tissue array were examined. MVD was counted and the relationship between the biological behaviors and prognosis was analyzed. RESULTS: The expression of COX-2 in gastric cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in normal mucosa (χ2 = 12.191, P < 0.05). The over-expression of COX-2 in gastric cancer was obviously related to metastasis and depth of invasion (χ2 = 6.315, P < 0.05), but not related to the histological type and Borrmann type (χ2 = 5.391 and χ2 = 2.228, respectively). Moreover, MVD in gastric cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in the normal mucosa (65.49 ± 20.64 vs 36.21 ± 18.47, t/F = 7.53, P < 0. 05). MVD was related to the histologic type and metastasis (t/F = 3.68 and t/F = 4.214, respectively, P < 0. 05), but not related to the depth of invasion and Borrmann type (t/F = 0.583 and t/F = 0.459, respectively). MVD in COX-2-positive tissues was markedly higher compared to COX-2-negative tissues, indicating a positive correlation between COX-2 expression and MVD (t = 13.12, P < 0. 05). CONCLUSION: Tissue microarray (TMA) is a powerful tool for rapid identifi cation of the molecular alterations in gastric cancer. COX-2 expression, via inducingangiogenesis, may play an important role in gastric carcinogenesis. It could be served as a determinant factor for clinical prognosis and curative effect. AIM: To explore the expression and clinicopathological significance of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and microvessel density (MVD) in gastric carcinogenesis, and to investigate their roles in the invasion and the relationship between biological behaviors and prognosis of gastric cancer. METHODS: Using Envision immunohistochemistry, COX-2 and CD34 expressions in gastric cancer tissue array. Examined: MVD was counted and the relationship between the biological behaviors and prognosis was analyzed. RESULTS: The expression of COX-2 in gastric cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in normal mucosa (χ2 = 12.191, P <0.05). The over-expression of COX-2 in gastric cancer was obviously related to metastasis and depth of invasion (χ2 = 6.315, P <0.05), but not related to the histological type and Borrmann type (χ2 = 5.391 and χ2 = 2.228, respectively). Moreover, MVD in gastric cancer tissues was significantly higher than that in the normal mucosa (65.49 ± 20.64 vs 36.21 ± 18.47, t / F = 7.53, P <0.05). MVD was related to the histologic type and metastasis (t / F = 3.68 and t / F = 4.214, respectively, P <0.05), but not related to the depth MVD in COX-2-positive tissues was markedly higher than that of COX-2-negative tissues, indicating a positive correlation between COX-2 expression (t / F = 0.583 and t / and MVD (t = 13.12, P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Tissue microarray (TMA) is a powerful tool for rapid identification of the molecular alterations in gastric cancer. COX-2 expression, via inducingangiogenesis, may play an important role in gastric carcinogenesis. It could be served as a determinant factor for clinical prognosis and curative effect.