如何理解和适用《专利法》(2008年修正)第三十三条关于修改超范围的规定,是近年来专利授权确权案件审判实践中的热点和难点问题。最高人民法院自2011年以来,先后审理了曾关生案、上海家化案、爱普生墨盒案等多起典型案件,对《专利法》第三十三条的立法目的、该条与相关法律条款之间的联系与区别以及该条适用中需要掌握的原则等重要问题阐述了意见,引起了业内的广泛关注。本文试就相关问题作进一步解读。 How to Understand and Apply the “Patent Law” (2008 Amendment) Article 33 The provisions on amending the out of range are hot and difficult issues in the trial of patent right confirmation cases in recent years. Since 2011, the Supreme People’s Court has successively tried many typical cases such as Zeng Guanzheng’s case, Shanghai Jahwa case and Epson cartridge case. Since the legislative purpose of Article 33 of the Patent Law is between the article and relevant legal provisions And the differences between the application of the article and the need to master the principles and other important issues elaborated opinions, aroused widespread concern in the industry. This article tries to further explain the related issues.