论文部分内容阅读
“唯物史观”或“历史唯物主义”已经成为当代思想界讨论最多、分歧最大,甚至可以说说法最混乱的议题之一,在相当多的论者那里,它已经脱离了其创立者——马克思、恩格斯和其阐释载体——那些蕴涵深邃但非常散乱的文本,独立而抽象地成为一种可以随意搀杂、涵摄和剔除任何内容的“大口袋”或“大熔炉”。鉴于此,回到马克思的文本序列中追溯其不同阶段的思想运演、具体阐发和论证逻辑,是比原理性的表述更为“鲜活”的思想史佐证、评判依据和发展基础。本文详细地梳理了《德意志意识形态.费尔巴哈》中“两个誊清稿”对这一问题的论述,从中不难看出,马克思主义哲学是在什么意义和基础上推进唯物主义、又是怎样扬弃和超越唯心主义的。
“Historical Materialism” or “Historical Materialism” has become one of the topics most discussed, divided, and even arguably the most chaotic in the contemporary world of thought. It has been detached from a considerable number of theorists Founders - Marx, Engels and their explanation carriers - those deep but very messy texts that, independently and abstractly, become “big pockets” or “big ones” that can be easily adulterated, culled and cull everything furnace“. In view of this, returning to Marx’s textual tracing back to its different phases of ideological performance, concrete elucidation and argumentation of logic is more evidence-based, more evidence-based and more developmental than ”rational representation.“ This dissertation elaborates on this issue in detail in ”German Ideology Feuerbach“ and ”Two Qing Manuscripts", from which it is easy to see that Marxism philosophy is promoting materialism on the basis of its significance , But also how to subdue and transcend idealism.