论文部分内容阅读
本文对当前广泛流行于国内外的“‘克隆人’在伦理道德上不可接受”的观点提出了质疑.本文力图阐明的主要观点如下:1、人类自然而然的有性生殖并非无懈可击,克隆技术有限度地用于人类完善自身的目的也不会亵渎人的尊严.2、非治疗性的人体以及胚胎试验不一定侵犯人的权益,要求人体克隆技术万无一失是不实际也不公平的.3、割裂生育和性交的联系并非不合人之常情,人类的婚姻家庭模式也是可以变化的.在阐述中特别比较了“体外授精”与“人体克隆”在伦理道德上的可接受性,指出人们接受前者而拒绝后者实际上存在着“双重标准”.
This article questioned the ethical unacceptability of “Clone”, which is widely prevalent at home and abroad.This paper attempts to clarify the main points are as follows: 1, Human natural sexual reproduction is not flawless, the cloning technology is limited The purpose of human use to improve their own will not be profane dignity.2, non-therapeutic human and embryonic trials do not necessarily infringe upon the rights and interests of people, requiring foolproof human cloning technology is neither practical nor fair.3, split birth And the relationship between sexual intercourse is not a common ancestor, human marriage and family patterns can also be changed in the elaboration of the “in vitro fertilization” and “human cloning” in the ethical and moral acceptability, that people accept the former and refused The latter is actually a “double standard.”