论文部分内容阅读
目的:总结湖北少数民族地区骨龄鉴定经验,探讨骨龄鉴定在司法鉴定中的适用性。方法:回顾性分析142例有“年龄”并使用CHN法行骨龄司法鉴定的案例资料,并与自报或从户籍等相关资料中查阅的“年龄”进行对照。结果:骨龄与“年龄”完全相符的仅占鉴定总数的12.68%,骨龄与“年龄”存在误差的鉴定对象中,居住在农村和成长环境较差的分别占97.39%和96.04%,远高于居住在城镇和成长环境较好的44.44%和7.98%的占比。结论:湖北民族地区骨龄鉴定结果与原“年龄”记录误差较大,骨龄鉴定是鉴别案件当事人真实年龄的重要手段,但影响因素较多,骨龄鉴定仍应结合其他材料,形成完整证据链,才能作为定案依据。
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the experience of bone age identification in Hubei ethnic minority areas and to explore the applicability of bone age identification in forensic science. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 142 cases with “age ” and using CHN method of bone-age forensic identification of case data and self-reported or from household registration and other relevant information access “age ” for comparison. Results: Only 12.68% of the total number of identifications of bone age and “age ”, 97.39% and 96.04% of the identified objects with errors in bone age and "age , Much higher than the proportion of 44.44% and 7.98% which are better living in urban areas and growing environment. CONCLUSION: The results of bone age identification in Hubei ethnic areas are quite different from the records of original age. The identification of bone age is an important means of identifying the true age of the parties involved, but there are many influencing factors. Bone age identification should still be combined with other materials to form a complete evidence chain , Can be used as the basis for the verdict.