论文部分内容阅读
在中央电视台《百家讲坛》开讲《〈论语〉心得》、《〈庄子〉心得》而受到热烈追捧的女教授于丹,3月初遭到了包括北京大学、清华大学等知名大学的几位博士、硕士等(下依媒体统称“十博士”)的联名抵制,一时间,网上网下争议四起,“于丹VS十博士”事件由此被称作是“2007年中国文化界第一公案”。3月12日,这桩公案又有了续篇——来自重庆几所大学的十位博士联名发表为于丹“维权”的声明。于丹是否讲解经典的合适人选?其打破严谨之风、以轻松姿态讲解经典著作的做法,是混淆视听,还是泽被大众之举?反观之前白先勇打造“青春版”《牡丹亭》等一系列文化事件,争议无不聚焦于“意在光大传统、却被批评为歪曲传统”,那么,传统文化在现代社会的传播,究竟该走一条什么样的道路?
Female professor Yu Dan, who was enthusiastically sought after by CCTV’s “100 Lecture Forums”, delivered a series of lectures on “The Analects of Confucius” and “Experience of Zhuangzi”. In early March, she was admitted to several doctorates and master’s degrees from well-known universities such as Peking University and Tsinghua University (Under the media, collectively known as “Dr. Shi”) of the boycott, for a time, online and offline controversy four, “Yu Dan VS VS Dr.” incident was thus called “2007 Chinese culture first case.” On March 12, there was another sequel to this pile of cases - ten doctors from several universities in Chongqing jointly issued a statement on “safeguarding their rights” in Yuandan. Yu Dan is the right person to explain the classic? Its break the rigorous style, a relaxed gesture to explain the practice of the classic book is to confuse or Ze is the public move? In contrast before Bai Xianyong to create “Youth” “Peony Pavilion” and a series of other cultures Events, controversies are all focused on “intended to Everbright tradition, has been criticized as distorting the traditional”, then, the spread of traditional culture in modern society, what should take a road?