论文部分内容阅读
日前,江苏省无锡市中级人民法院召开新闻发布会,公布了2014年度十大精品案例,其中施耐德电气(中国)有限公司诉江苏施耐德电气有限公司侵害商标权及不正当纠纷案,厘清了商标与企业字号的法律关系,依法平等地保护了外商投资企业品牌。为此,笔者采访了无锡中院知识产权庭法官朱佳丹,就该案的审前调查、审理过程、判决结论及在国内法律界产生的影响作了详细了解,认为此案在许多方面给相关企业以深刻的启示,为
Recently, Wuxi Intermediate People’s Court held a news conference to announce the top ten best-quality cases in 2014. Among them, Schneider Electric (China) Co., Ltd. v. Jiangsu Schneider Electric Co., Ltd. infringed trademark rights and improper disputes, clarified the trademark and Corporate name of the legal relationship, according to the law to protect the brand of foreign-invested enterprises. To this end, the author interviewed Judge Zhu Jia-Dan, a judge of Intellectual Property Court of Wuxi Intermediate People’s Court, and made a detailed understanding of the pre-trial investigation, the trial process, the verdict of the judgment and the impact it has had on the domestic legal community. He believes that the case gives the relevant enterprises With profound revelation, for