论文部分内容阅读
在美国学界,关于非法证据排除的理由有三个,即维护司法尊严、抑制警察非法取证以及宪法性救济。目前,我国学者也纷纷以这三个理由来论证我国确立非法证据排除规则的必要性。通过对这些理由的逐一分析,认为非法证据排除规则对于我国的作用有限。若要实现刑事诉讼的现代化,我们应当更多地从整个刑事诉讼体制上做文章,而不能将全部期望寄托在非法证据排除这一项规则之上。
In American academic circles, there are three reasons for excluding illegal evidence, namely, safeguarding the dignity of the judiciary, suppressing illegal evidence collection by the police and constitutional remedies. At present, scholars in our country also use these three reasons to prove the necessity of establishing an exclusionary rule of illegal evidence in our country. Through the analysis of these reasons one by one, that the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence for our role is limited. To modernize criminal lawsuits, we should make more fuss over the entire system of criminal proceedings rather than placing all our hopes on the rule that excludes illegitimate evidence.