论文部分内容阅读
实验室先后通过了省级计量认证(CMA)、实验室认可(CNAS)、省级食品检验机构资质认定(CMAF),当然还有其它一些行业内的从业资质。体系文件随着认证认可准则的变化和要求,历经了五次修订转版,由初版到目前的第6版,质量管理体系在运行中发现问题并持续改进,日臻完善。历次的监督评审、复查评审,均能保证已经获得检验检测能力的维持和管理水平的进一步提升,本文以潮州市疾病预防控制中心为例阐述实验室认证认可对疾控系统的新要求。
The laboratory has successively passed provincial CMA, CNAS, CMAF and, of course, some other industry practitioners. With the changes and requirements of certification and accreditation criteria, the system documentation has undergone five revision and revision, from the first edition to the current sixth edition. The quality management system found problems during operation and continued to improve. All previous supervision, review and re-evaluation can guarantee the maintenance and management level of inspection and testing capability has been further improved. This paper takes Chaozhou CDC as an example to illustrate the new requirements of CDC for laboratory accreditation.