本文试图采用一种新的方法和简单的模型重新表述剑桥资本争论的逻辑。显然,逻辑悖论产生于一种理论原有的假设在逻辑通论过程中被暗中修改了。在资本争论中,这个被暗中修改的假设即是“给定的技术”。基于斯拉伐的模型以及新古典模型的稳定状态比较,实际上是稳定状态的转换,这就使给定技 This article attempts to reformulate the logic of the capitalist debate in Cambridge using a new approach and simple model. Obviously, the hypothesis that the logic paradox has originated from a theory has been secretly modified in the process of logical generalization. In the capital controversy, this hypothesis, which was implicitly modified, is “given technology.” A comparison of the steady state of a model based on LAC and the neoclassical model is actually a steady state transition, which makes a given technology