论文部分内容阅读
目的分析肘前入路与肘外侧入路治疗桡骨头骨折的临床效果。方法将128例桡骨头骨折患者平均分成甲组和乙组各64例。甲组为肘前侧入路；乙组为肘外侧入路。对比两组的并发症及6个月后肘关节功能的恢复情况。结果甲组并发症低于乙组，6个月后甲组肘关节功能评分的优良率也高于乙组。结论肘前侧入路比肘外侧入路更适合对桡骨头骨折的治疗。“,”Objective To analyze the clinical ef ect of anterior elbow approach road and elbow lateral approach for the treatment of radial head fractures. Methods 128 cases of radial head fracture patients were divided into group A and group B 64 cases. Group A for the elbow anterior approach; B for the lateral approach to the elbow. The two groups were compared complications and elbow function after six months of recovery. Results Group A complication is less than B, six months after the Group A elbow score excel ent rate is also higher than B Conclusion anterior elbow elbow than lateral approach is more suitable for the treatment of radial head fractures.