论文部分内容阅读
我国刑法理论对安乐死问题研究较浅,且研究靶点重复,原因在于理论研究存在误区。安乐死的深入研究首先必须对死亡权进行反思,进而对目前不规范的安乐死分类进行清理。建立科学的分类,即实质的安乐死、积极促进型安乐死、伴随促进型安乐死、自然死亡型安乐死。在此基础上重新界定安乐死:指患者由于不可治愈的疾病伴有激烈疼痛并濒临死亡,出于本人自愿而申请以减轻、消除痛苦或缩短痛苦时间的医疗方式结束生命的过程与状态。理论研究应明确划分安乐死与尊严死的界限。人所享有的死亡权应当是相对的,只有在特定条件下才拥有相对死亡权,这种权利的实施必须置于国家公权力的监督之下。
The theory of criminal law in our country has a shallow research on the issue of euthanasia, and the research targets are repeated because of the misunderstanding in theoretical research. In-depth study of euthanasia must first reflect on the right to death, and then clean up the current classification of euthanasia. To establish a scientific classification, that is, the actual euthanasia, and actively promote euthanasia, with the promotion of euthanasia, natural death euthanasia. On this basis, to redefine euthanasia: refers to the patient as a result of incurable diseases accompanied by intense pain and on the verge of death, volunteered to apply to reduce, eliminate pain or shorten the duration of the medical treatment of the end of the process and status of life. Theoretical research should clearly define the boundaries between euthanasia and dignity. The right to death enjoyed by a person should be relative. Only under certain conditions should he have the right of death. The implementation of such a right must be under the supervision of the state public authority.