论文部分内容阅读
本文探讨梯级论证的辩驳之力。梯级论证是使用梯级修辞手法,以语用梯级中某一含有极量值的事项为对比参照点来论证同一语用梯级中的另一个事项。在论辩中,梯级论证是讲话人借以操控听话人的认知和情感反应的重要手段之一:一方面,它能突显矛盾,批驳谬误,驳倒对方;另一方面,它还能调节语气,传递强劲的语力。本文突破梯级含义和梯级修辞理论的研究方法和范围的局限,从交际双方互动的角度剖析论辩中的梯级修辞策略。
This article explores the power of arguments in cascade arguments. Cascade argument is the use of cascading rhetorical devices, pragmatic cascade with a matter of extreme value as a reference point contrast to the same pragmatic cascade in another matter. In argumentation, the cascade argument is one of the important means by which the speaker manipulates the cognition and emotional response of the obedient: on the one hand, it can highlight contradictions, criticize fallacies and refute each other; on the other hand, it can also regulate tone, Strong language. This article breaks through the limitations of the methods and range of the meaning of the ladder and the theory of the ladder rhetoric, and analyzes the ladder rhetorical strategies in the argument from the perspective of interaction between the two parties.