编辑同志: 《提要》3.1说,名词短语在句子里的功能与名词相同。3.1.7又说名词短语可以作主语。例句是“西双版纳密林是大象出没的地方”。3.2.1所举的名词短语作宾语的例句有“北京是中国的首都”。这说明偏正结构的名词短语是可以作主语、作宾语的。同样,根据《提要》3.2.7和3.3.2来看,偏正结构的动词短语、形容词短语也可以作句子成分。既然《提要》这样强调短语的地位,为什么用符号法分析句子时还要把定语、状语划出来? Editorial comrades: “Summary” 3.1 said that the noun phrase in the sentence function and the same noun. 3.1.7 say noun phrases can be the subject. Example sentence is “Xishuangbanna Jungle is where the elephants ”. 3.2.1 Cite Examples of Nominal Phrases as Objects There is an example of “Beijing is the capital of China.” This shows that the nominal structure of the nominal structure of the phrase can be used as the subject, as the object. Similarly, according to “Synopsis 3.2.7” and “3.3.2”, verb phrases and adjective phrases with partial structure can also be used as sentence elements. Since the “abstract” to emphasize the status of the phrase, why use symbols to analyze the sentence but also attributive, adverbial out?