论文部分内容阅读
刑法关于犯罪构成体系的理论包括犯罪本体要件与排除犯罪事由,前者为认定犯罪提供基本的实体法依据,后者保障那些看似符合犯罪特征但是具有正当性的行为不被认定为犯罪。与主体的诉讼利益相适应,刑事诉讼证明责任分配的一般原则即控诉方对犯罪本体要件承担证明责任,而被告人对排除犯罪事由承担一定的证明责任。我国犯罪构成理论不但没有体现定罪的逻辑体系,也没有给被告人抗辩提供充分的空间,需要与刑事诉讼证明责任的分配理论结合进行研究和改造。
The criminal law’s theory of the composition of crime includes the elements of the crime itself and the exclusion of the crime. The former provides the basic substantive law basis for the determination of crime, while the latter guarantees that those acts that appear to be in conformity with the characteristics of the crime are not deemed as crimes. And the subject of the litigation interest to adapt to the criminal prosecution burden of proof of the general principle that the complainant should bear the burden of proof of the elements of the crime of proof, and the defendant to eliminate the criminal subject to bear some burden of proof. The theory of constitution of crime in our country not only failed to embody the logic system of conviction, nor did it provide sufficient space for defendants to defend themselves. It needs to be studied and reconstructed in combination with the theory of distribution of burden of proof in criminal procedure.