论文部分内容阅读
自从1993年世界银行发表它的研究报告:《东亚奇迹经济增长和公共政策》以来,政府在东亚经济发展中的作用成为一个世界性话题。C.约翰逊的《通产省与日本奇迹》(1980)、A.H阿姆斯登的《亚洲的下一个巨人》、R.韦达的《驾驭市场——经济理论和政府在东亚工业的作用》等书中,倾向认为,东亚经济的成功的秘密在于:它们的强势政府对经济的大量干预弥补了发展时期大量存在的市场失灵现象,促进了产业的繁荣。离开了政府的干预,这些都将难以实现。然而对于由九七年爆发的韩国金融危机,人们普遍认为政府对经济的过多干预难辞其咎。那么韩国政府的过多干预对韩国的经济、贸易的发展产生了何种影响呢?
Since the World Bank published its study in 1993: “The miracle of economic growth in East Asia and public policy,” the role of the government in the economic development of East Asia has become a worldwide topic. C. Johnson’s “MITI and Japan Miracle” (1980), AH Armsten’s “The Next Giant in Asia,” R. Veda’s “Harnessing the Market - The Role of Economic Theory and Government in East Asian Industries” In other books, the tendency is that the secret of the success of the East Asian economies lies in the fact that the massive intervention by the powerful governments in the economy remedies the massive market failure during the development period and promotes the prosperity of the industry. Without government intervention, these will be hard to come by. However, with regard to the financial crisis in South Korea that erupted in 1997, it is generally accepted that the government has to blame for too much intervention in the economy. So what is the effect of the excessive intervention of the South Korean government on the economic and trade development of South Korea?