目前,在编辑学的研究中,编辑选择这一重要命题已为愈来愈多的研究者所关注。但在众多的论述中,笔者感到似乎存在一个值得注意的偏颇,即过分强调、夸张了编辑选择的重要性,而忽视、贬低了作者的选择性。从编辑工程的角度看,编辑活动是由编辑和作者共同构成的,编辑选择和作者选择构成了编辑活动的相互依存、相互制约、相互促进的基本关系。编辑选择与作者选择是一个具有能动性的复合体。本文拟对编辑选择与作者选择的双向性做一点探讨。 1、编辑选择概要编辑选择是信息传播的需要。现代社会是信息社会,各种信息浩如烟海。据介绍,目前全世界每年出版的图书有70万种,期刊13万多种,报纸5万多种,仅每年发表的科研论文就有约500万篇。编辑时刻处在各种信息的冲击之中,作为信息传播的枢纽,为了使最有价值的 At present, editorial selection in this study, editor of this important proposition has attracted more and more researchers. However, in many expositions, I feel there seems to be a notable bias, that is overemphasized, exaggerating the importance of editing choices, while ignoring and belittling the author’s selectivity. From the point of view of editing project, editing activities are composed of editors and authors. Editors choice and author selection form the basic interdependence, mutual restriction and mutual promotion of editing activities. Editor’s choice and author’s choice are motivated complexes. This article intends to discuss the two-way nature of editors’ choice and author’s choice. 1, Editor’s Choice Summary Editor’s Choice is the need for information dissemination. Modern society is an information society, all kinds of information vast. According to reports, there are 700,000 kinds of books published each year in the world, more than 130,000 periodicals and over 50,000 newspapers, and about 5 million scientific papers are published each year. Editor moment in the impact of a variety of information, as the hub of information dissemination, in order to make the most valuable