1872年的一天,美国加利福尼亚的一家餐馆里,斯坦福与科恩发生了激烈争论:马奔跑时蹄子是否都着地?斯坦福认为奔跑的马在跃起的瞬间四蹄是腾空的;科恩却认为,马奔跑时始终有一蹄着地.由于谁也说服不了谁,于是就采取了美国人惯用的打赌方式来解决.他们约定了打赌金额后,请来了一位驯马好手裁决.然而,这位裁判员也难以判断谁是谁非,因为单凭人的眼 One day in 1872, at a restaurant in California, Stamford argued furiously with Cohen: Did all the horses hoof their horses during the run? Stanford thought the running horse was vacated at the moment of the jump; Cohen thought the horse ran There is always a hoof to the ground.Because who can not convince anyone, so they took the usual way of using American bets to settle.After they agreed the bet amount, you came to a good horse dress ruling.However, the referee also It is difficult to judge who is right and wrong, because alone people’s eyes