论文部分内容阅读
发达国家的技术进步主要依赖于自主研发和技术创新,而发展中国家则主要是通过技术引进来缩短与发达国家的技术水平差距。本文假设跨国公司的技术授权采用特许权收费的形式,运用古诺双寡头竞争模型,侧重对比分析自由贸易下和存在进口关税时跨国公司技术授权与否对东道国企业、消费者以及总体社会福利效应的影响。对比自由贸易和进口关税两种情况后发现:如果技术授权采用特许权收费形式,无论是自由贸易还是存在进口关税,跨国公司都会进行技术授权;存在进口关税时,东道国政府通过调节关税税率诱导跨国公司进行技术授权,能提高东道国企业利润并实现社会福利最大化,但是相比自由贸易时会减少消费者剩余。
The technological progress in developed countries mainly relies on independent research and development and technological innovation while developing countries mainly shorten the technological level gap with developed countries through technology introduction. This paper assumes that the technology license of multinational corporations adopts the concession fee model and the Cournot duopoly competition model, focusing on the comparative analysis of the multinational corporations’ technology authorization under the free trade and the existence of import tariffs on the host country enterprises, consumers and the overall social welfare effect Impact. Comparing the two cases of free trade and import tariffs, it is found that if the technology license adopts the form of license fee, whether it is free trade or import tariff, transnational corporations will carry out the technology authorization; when there is import tariff, the host government will induce transnationality by adjusting the tariff rate Technology licensing companies can increase profits and maximize social benefits for host country enterprises, but reduce consumer surplus when compared to free trade.