论文部分内容阅读
当下中国的实践哲学研究取得了一些重要的学术成果,但是,它还处在开创阶段,在一些基础性和前提性的概念上,学者们还没有达成基本的共识,还处在自说自话和纷争不息的状态,有鉴于此,为了推进实践哲学研究,需要做五对必要的区分:按照实践主体的不同,区分为经验的、道德的和本体的实践;当人们在本体的层面上使用实践概念的时候,由于本体预设的不同,他们的实践哲学也可区分为生存论的实践哲学与超验论的实践哲学;从实践哲学的讨论与具体的实践情境和实践行为的关系来看,大致可以分为形式的实践哲学与质料的实践哲学;就一种实践理论所反思的对象是否涉及一般意义上的实践本身,这个问题可以区分为元实践学与部门实践哲学;而就道德的实践哲学而言,我们可以按照道德的实践哲学的善恶判断标准的不同对这些道德的实践哲学进行分类,区分为结果论的实践哲学和动机论的实践哲学。
At present, the study of practical philosophy in China has made some important academic achievements. However, it is still in the pioneering stage. On some basic and preconditioned concepts, scholars have not yet reached a basic consensus and are still talking about themselves In view of this, in order to promote the study of practical philosophy, we need to make the necessary distinction between the five pairs: according to the different subjects of practice, the distinction between experience, moral and ontological practice; when people are on the level of ontology When using the concept of practice, due to the different presuppositions of their ontology, their practical philosophy can also be divided into the practical philosophy of existentialism and the practical philosophy of transcendentalism. From the relationship between the discussion of practical philosophy and the concrete practice situation and practice Generally speaking, it can be divided into practical philosophies and material practical philosophies in forms; whether the object to be rethought in a practical theory involves the practice in the general sense itself can be divided into the meta-practice and the departmental practical philosophies; Of practical philosophy, we can classify these practical philosophies according to the criterion of good and evil judgment of moral practical philosophy, and distinguish them as If the theory of practical philosophy practical philosophy and motivation theory.