论文部分内容阅读
学者普遍认为2000年最高人民法院《关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》包含了信赖原则的法理。根据上述解释,司法实践中的现状为公安交警部门成为信赖原则的适用机关且信赖原则的适用条件过于宽泛。这也使得在交通肇事罪中应用信赖原则时产生了许多问题,比如弱化了刑法的法益保护功能。而产生这些问题的根本原因在于对上述司法解释的错误理解。要避免上述误解,对上述司法解释的完善是必然途径。
Scholars generally agree that the Supreme People’s Court’s 2000 Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Specific Application of Law in the Trial of Criminal Cases of Traffic Accident contains the jurisprudence of the principle of trust. According to the above explanation, the status quo in the judicial practice is that the application conditions of the principle that the public security and traffic police departments become the trusted organs of trust and the principle of trust are too broad. This also makes many problems arise when applying the principle of trust in the crime of traffic accident, such as weakening the legal protection function of criminal law. The root cause of these problems lies in the misunderstanding of the above judicial interpretation. To avoid the above misunderstanding, the above judicial interpretation is the inevitable way to improve.