论文部分内容阅读
德国司法判例认为不容许的侦查陷阱构成对被唆使者的刑罚减轻事由,德国学界则主要存在着不容许的侦查陷阱导致证据使用禁止、形成程序障碍或者构成刑罚排除事由等见解之间的争议。本文在归纳总结了各方观点后指出,在德国法体系中,不容许的侦查陷阱之所以不被容许,根本原因在于其侵犯了《德国宪法》第1条第1款所规定的人性尊严和《德国宪法》第2条第1款所保障的公民基本权利,并对各种见解进行了批判性的分析。
German judicial jurisprudence that does not allow the investigation of the trap constitutes a cause of incitement to reduce the penalty, the German academia is mainly the existence of the investigation of non-permitting the use of evidence to prohibit the formation of procedural obstacles or constitute a controversy between the reasons for the exclusion of sentence. After summarizing the views of all parties, this article points out that the reason why the impermissible investigation trap in German law system is not allowed is that the fundamental reason is that it violates the human dignity stipulated in Article 1, paragraph 1, of the German Constitution and The basic civil rights guaranteed by article 2, paragraph 1, of the German Constitution, and a critical analysis of the various opinions.