庄子认为,春秋战国时期的诸子在争鸣中,各自以自己的政治伦理主张为判断是非的标准,是造成天下“是非之途,樊然乱”的根本原因。为此,庄子在对理想人格的追求中,在对取法标准的主观性的批判中,提出了“辩无胜”的观点。“辩无胜”从反面促进了中国古代名辨学的发展,对于我们今天批判、破除现代“辩无胜”,树立法的观念,也有着积极的现代启示。肴殳 Zhuangzi believed that in the midst of controversy among the various scholars in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, each of them regarded their own political ethics as the criterion for judging right and wrong, which is the fundamental reason for creating a “non-stop road to peace and disorder” in the world. For this reason, in the pursuit of ideal personality, Zhuangzi put forward the view of “no victory or defeat” in the subjective critique of the standard of taking legal action. “Advocacy” has promoted the development of ancient Chinese dialectology from the opposite, and it also has a positive and modern enlightenment for today’s critique and the dismantling of the modern concept of “no victory or defeat” and the establishment of law. Food 殳