论文部分内容阅读
[目的]了解农民工技校学生艾滋病相关知识、态度、需求状况,评价对他们进行艾滋病健康教育干预的效果。[方法]2007年,在泰安市抽取泰山区神龙技校学生69名,进行艾滋病健康教育措施干预与评价。[结果]调查69人,艾滋病相关知识知晓率干预前为72.05%,干预后为86.68%(P<0.01)。干预前知晓率较高的(主要传播途径等)和专业性比较强的知识知晓率与干预后的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);其他知识的知晓率干预后均高于干预前(P<0.01或<0.05)。认为对HIV感染者的身份应保密的、认为应允许HIV感染者继续工作的、认为艾滋病病人或HIV感染者是疾病的受害者应得到同情和帮助的人,干预后多于干预前(P<0.01或P<0.05);如果朋友或亲人得了艾滋病会关心帮助的,干预前66人,干预后68人(P>0.05)。[结论]健康教育干预措施对提高农民工技校学生艾滋病知识知晓率,改变有关态度是有效的。
[Objective] To understand the HIV / AIDS related knowledge, attitude and needs of migrant workers’ technical school students and evaluate their effect on HIV / AIDS health education intervention. [Methods] In 2007, 69 Tai-Long School of Skill students were selected from Tai’an City for intervention and evaluation of HIV / AIDS health education measures. [Results] The survey of 69 people, awareness of AIDS-related knowledge before intervention was 72.05%, 86.68% after intervention (P <0.01). There was no significant difference between the rate of awareness before intervention (main routes of transmission, etc.) and the more specialized ones after intervention (P> 0.05); the awareness rate of other knowledge after intervention was higher than that before intervention P <0.01 or <0.05). Those who think that the identity of HIV-infected persons should be kept confidential should be allowed to continue to work for HIV-infected persons, those who think that AIDS patients or HIV-infected persons should be sympathetic and helpful to victims of the disease should be treated more frequently than before intervention (P < 0.01 or P <0.05). If a friend or loved one had AIDS, he would care for it, 66 before intervention and 68 after intervention (P> 0.05). [Conclusion] It is effective to improve the awareness of HIV / AIDS among migrant workers’ technical school students and to change their attitudes about health education interventions.