论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨宫颈糜烂临床上常用于治疗方法。方法对确诊为宫颈糜烂的117例患者分别进行微波手术和LEEP手术治疗,分析手术有效率。结果单纯型宫颈糜烂,两种手术无显著性差异;对于颗粒型和乳突型,LEEP组优于微波手术,差异均有显著性。结论微波和LEEP对宫颈糜烂治疗均达到良好效果;单纯型宫颈糜烂,使用两种手术方式均可;颗粒型和乳头型宫颈糜烂,临床建议使用LEEP手术。
Objective To investigate the clinical treatment of cervical erosion commonly used in treatment. Methods A total of 117 patients diagnosed with cervical erosion were treated with microwave and LEEP respectively, and the operative efficiency was analyzed. Results Simple cervical erosion, no significant difference between the two operations; for granular and papillary type, LEEP group is better than microwave surgery, the difference was significant. Conclusions Both microwave and LEEP have good effect on the treatment of cervical erosion. Simple type of cervical erosion can be used by both operation methods; granular and papillary cervical erosion, clinical use of LEEP is recommended.