我们必须从新的观点重新分析这些批评文本,现在我们已经说明了托尔斯泰的作品,在它不足的局限内部,就其本身的形式来说是完整的。我们知道,我们正在托尔斯泰作品内部寻找他的作品与历史的联系;但我们不知道这种研究如何进行,也不知道在实际上将处理什么样的材料。在上文提供的阐释中,文本本身仿佛由于它的内容而被取消了。除托尔斯泰作品的特征,我们已经说明了一切。很明显,认识这些作品不等于认识构造这些作品的材料。我们必须把列宁的解释与即将对这位作家作品的界定区别开来。由于策略上的缘故,这种新的描述必须与先前的描述区别开来,尽管它们在实际上是分不开的。列宁那些论托尔斯泰的文章阐述了某些重要概 We must reanalyse these critical texts from a new point of view. Now that we have illustrated that Tolstoy’s work, within its limitations, is complete in its own form. We know that we are looking for links between his work and history within Tolstoy’s work; but we do not know how this research is done or what material it actually will handle. In the explanation provided above, the text itself seems to have been canceled because of its content. In addition to the features of Tolstoy’s work, we have explained everything. Obviously, knowing these works does not mean knowing the material that constructed them. We must distinguish Lenin’s interpretation from the one about the author’s work. Due to tactical reasons, this new description must be distinguished from the previous description, although they are in fact inseparable. Some of Lenin’s articles on Tolstoy outline some important facts