论文部分内容阅读
目的对比牙齿外伤后种植牙延迟修复与即刻修复的效果。方法回顾性分析2012年12月至2014年12月东莞市第五人民医院收治的70例牙齿外伤患者,按不同治疗方案分为两组,每组35例。行种植牙延迟修复者作为对照组,行种植牙即刻修复者作为研究组,对比两组临床效果。结果两组治疗后ISQ值比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05),但研究组疼痛程度与治疗周期均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后并发症均表现为牙周松动、牙周组织红肿与牙周组织溢脓,但两组并发症总发生率比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在综合患者临床指征基础上予以精细操作,即刻种植可取得与延迟种植的相似疗效,同时可减轻患者痛苦,值得临床应用。
Objective To compare the effect of delayed repair and immediate repair of dental implants after dental trauma. Methods A retrospective analysis of 70 patients with traumatic injuries admitted to the Fifth People’s Hospital of Dongguan City from December 2012 to December 2014 was divided into two groups with 35 cases in each group. Dental implants were used as the control group, and dental implants were used as the study group to compare the clinical effects of the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in ISQ between the two groups (P> 0.05), but the pain degree and treatment period in the study group were shorter than those in the control group (P <0.05). The postoperative complications Symptoms showed periodontal loosening, periodontal tissue swelling and periodontal tissue overflow pus, but the total incidence of complications between the two groups showed no significant difference (P> 0.05). Conclusion Based on the clinical indications of patients, fine operation is needed. Immediate implantation can achieve similar curative effect with delayed planting. At the same time, it can reduce the suffering of patients and is worthy of clinical application.