论文部分内容阅读
60年代初期,“新批评”在法国勃然兴起。尽管这一名称涵盖着纷呈不一的批评方法,但是这些批评方法具有将历史拒之门外的共同倾向。时隔20年,新批评自身经历了巨大的嬗变,但是与历史相持的局面尚无明显改观。当今文评领域批评与历史两相对峙的历史渊源是什么?突破的可能性何在?这就是《文学的第三共和国》一书寻求解决的问题。此书的问世,在法国文坛引起一场微微风
In the early 1960s, “New Criticism” flourished in France. Although this name covers a wide range of methods of criticism, these methods of criticism have a common tendency to turn history off. After a lapse of 20 years, the new criticism has undergone tremendous changes. However, there has been no apparent change in the historical stalemate. What is the historical origin of the criticism and the historical two-phase confrontation in today’s literary criticism field? What is the possibility of breakthrough? This is the problem that the third republic of literature seeks to solve. The advent of this book, in the French literary world caused a slight breeze