中国目录学史研究中的方法论非常重要,不同的研究方法往往直接导致不同的研究结果。要想取得迥别前人的结论,首先应考虑如何在研究方法上突破前人。在分析权威方法利与弊的基础上,从个性化研究方法的使用、多种研究方法的综合运用、比较方法的介入等具体层面讨论了目录学史研究方法的更新问题。 Methodology in the study of history of Chinese bibliography is very important. Different research methods often lead directly to different research results. To make a difference between previous conclusions, we should first consider how to break through the previous research methods. Based on the analysis of the pros and cons of authoritative methods, this paper discusses the updating of research methods of bibliography history from the aspects of the use of individualized research methods, the comprehensive application of various research methods and the intervention of comparative methods.