目的:探讨德赛恩治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤的临床疗效。方法:将85例深Ⅱ度烧伤患者随机分为观察组43例与对照组42例,2组患者均常规消毒清创,观察组外用德赛恩液体敷料,对照组外用磺胺嘧啶锌软膏,疗程均为28天,对比2组患者治疗后7天和14天时的创面完全愈合率和疼痛评分,并观察2组患者的创面完全愈合时间。结果:观察组患者治疗后7天、14天的VAS评分均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(▲P<0.05);观察组患者治疗后7天、14天的创面愈合率则均高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(★P<0.05);对照组患者创面完全愈合时间为长于观察组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:德赛恩治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤患者能更有效减轻疼痛,缩短创面愈合时间,提高愈合率,值得临床推广。 Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of Desaine in the treatment of deep second degree burn. Methods: Eighty-five patients with deep second degree burn were randomly divided into observation group (n = 43) and control group (n = 42). The two groups were routinely disinfected and debridement. The observation group was treated with Desai liquid dressing and the control group was given sulfadiazine zinc ointment. All 28 days. The complete wound healing rate and pain score were compared between the two groups at 7 days and 14 days after treatment, and the complete wound healing time was observed in both groups. Results: The VAS score of observation group was lower than that of control group on the 7th day and the 14th day after treatment (P <0.05). The wound healing rate of the observation group was significantly higher on the 7th day and the 14th day In the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The wound healing time in the control group was longer than that in the observation group, with significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion: Desaine treatment of deep second degree burn patients can effectively reduce pain, shorten the wound healing time and improve the healing rate, it is worth clinical promotion.