论文部分内容阅读
尽管学术自由具有惠及学者个人和社会大众的普遍福祉,但这只是针对有道德限度后的自由而言的。学术自由的天然有限性和工具价值属性决定了对它进行道德限度的合理性,这一道德限度主要体现在以“善”为终极价值诉求,防止学术专制化,防止以自由为名义从事纯粹利己损他行为的发生。积极主观地承担学术责任无疑能有效地防止僭越这些道德限度,保障一种德性的学术生活。
Although academic freedom has the universal well-being of individual scholars and the general public, it is only about the moral freedoms. The natural and instrumental value of academic freedom determines the rationality of moral limits on it. The moral limit mainly lies in the pursuit of the ultimate value of “goodness”, the prevention of academic despotism and the prevention of freedom to act Purely self-defeating his behavior. Actively and subjectively shouldering academic responsibilities can undoubtedly effectively prevent these moral limits from exceeding and safeguard a virtuous academic life.