论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨LEEP刀与微波治疗慢性宫颈炎的疗效对比。方法:选取2012年5月～2012年12月本院妇科门诊收治的100例慢性宫颈炎患者,根据治疗方式不同分为LEEP刀治疗组和微波治疗组,每组50例。结果:LEEP刀组的平均手术时间短于微波治疗组,术中出血量和术后出血量比较,LEEP刀组少于微波治疗组,LEEP刀组术后阴道流液时间短于微波治疗组,两组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对于轻、中度患者,两种手术方法疗效没有差别(P>0.05);对于重度患者,LEEP刀治疗组疗效优于微波治疗组,两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:LEEP刀治疗慢性宫颈炎疗效显著,手术时间短,术中出血量少,术后恢复好,值得临床广泛推广。
Objective: To compare LEEP knife and microwave treatment of chronic cervicitis efficacy comparison. Methods: One hundred patients with chronic cervicitis admitted to our gynecology outpatient department from May 2012 to December 2012 were selected and divided into two groups: the LEEP-knife group and the microwave-treated group, with 50 cases in each group. Results: The mean operation time of LEEP group was shorter than that of microwave group. The amount of bleeding and postoperative bleeding in LEEP group was less than that in microwave group and shorter in LEEP group than in microwave group The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P <0.05). For mild and moderate patients, there was no difference between the two surgical methods (P> 0.05). For severe patients, the therapeutic effect of LEEP knife group was better than that of microwave group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: LEEP knife treatment of chronic cervicitis significant effect, short operative time, less blood loss, postoperative recovery is good, it is widely recommended in clinical.