Background: Current reports on robotic hepatic caudate lobectomy are limited to Spiegel lobectomy. This study aimed to compare the safety and feasibility of robotic isolated partial and complete hepatic caudate lobectomy.Methods: Clinical data of 32 patients who underwent robotic resection of the hepatic caudate lobe in our department from May 2016 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into three groups according to the lobectomy location: left dorsal segment lobectomy (Spiegel lobec- tomy), right dorsal segment lobectomy (caudate process or paracaval portion lobectomy), and complete caudate lobectomy. General information and perioperative results of the three groups were compared and analyzed. Results: Among the 32 patients, none had conversion to laparotomy, three received intraoperative blood transfusion (9.38％), and none had complications of Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅲ or higher or died in the peri- operative period. Among them, 17 patients (53.13％) underwent Spiegel lobectomy, 7 (21.88％) underwent caudate process or paracaval portion lobectomy, and 8 (25.00％) underwent complete caudate lobectomy. The operative time and blood loss in the left dorsal segment lobectomy group were significantly better than those in the right dorsal segment lobectomy and complete caudate lobectomy groups (operative time: P = 0.010 and P = 0.005; blood loss: P = 0.005 and P = 0.017, respectively). The postoperative hos- pital stay in the left dorsal segment lobectomy group was significantly shorter than that in the complete caudate lobectomy group ( P = 0.003); however, there was no difference in the postoperative hospital stay between the left dorsal segment lobectomy group and right dorsal segment lobectomy group ( P = 0.240). Conclusions: Robotic isolated partial and complete caudate lobectomy is safe and feasible. Spiegel lobec- tomy is relatively straightforward and suitable for beginners.