论文部分内容阅读
原稿:《土壤学家验收旱作水稻》改稿:《侯光炯教授肯定资中水稻旱作意义重大》编辑此稿,删改之处,主要有三。一是校准角度。水稻旱作,是水稻栽培技术的一大创新。水稻水栽水管,历来如此。旱栽旱管,行不行?这是人们最关心的问题。侯光炯教授,不仅是知名的土壤学家,而且是水稻半旱式栽培的创造者。由这样一位专家对旱作水稻作出评价,具有很大的权威性。这便是事件的新闻价值所在。
Manuscripts: “Soil scientists acceptance of dry rice” Referee: “Professor Hou Guangjiong affirmed the significance of capital in the paddy drought” Edit this draft, delete the place, there are three. First, the calibration point of view. Dry cultivation of rice is a major innovation of rice cultivation technology. Rice hydroponics, has always been. Upland dry pipe, okay? This is the people most concerned about the issue. Professor Hou Guangjiong is not only a famous soil scientist, but also the creator of semi-arid rice cultivation. The evaluation of dry rice by such an expert is of great authority. This is the news value of the incident.