论文部分内容阅读
目的 比较Alutard -SQ与中国现有过敏原浸液 ,了解国内过敏原浸液的状况 .方法 91例受试者 ,其中支气管哮喘或合并过敏性鼻炎 81例 ,10例正常人作对照 .实验组及对照组均行Alutard 和国内过敏原浸液皮肤点刺试验 ,测量风团及伪足的直径 ,比较两种过敏原浸液两种尘螨 (粉尘螨D .f.、屋尘螨D .p .)的差异 .结果两种尘螨过敏原浸液风团及伪足的直径有显著性差异 (p<0 .0 5 ) ,Alutard -SQ皮肤试验结果与特异性IgE水平相关性好 ,国内过敏原浸液皮肤试验与特异性IgE水平相关性差 .结论 国内过敏原浸液的质量仍需改善
OBJECTIVE To compare Alutard-SQ with the existing leaching solution of allergens in China and to find out the status of leaching solution of allergens in China.Methods Ninety-one subjects, including 81 asthmatic patients with bronchial asthma or allergic rhinitis and 10 normal controls, And control group were given Alutard and domestic allergen immersion skin prick test to measure the diameter of the wind group and pseudopodia, compared two allergens immersion two kinds of dust mites (Dust mite D.f. house dust mite D. p <0.05) .Results There was significant difference (p <0. 05) in diameter between the two groups of dust mite allergens and pseudopodia (p <0.05). The skin test results of Alutard-SQ showed good correlation with specific IgE levels, The correlation between domestic allergen immersion skin test and specific IgE level is poor.Conclusion The quality of domestic allergen immersion still needs improvement