论文部分内容阅读
语言世界是个十分模糊的世界。从哲学角度来看,语义的模糊性是绝对的,而明确性是相对的,由此决定了建立在成文法基础上的刑法规范也同时具有明确性与模糊性的特征。刑法规范追求明确具体,但从立法技术的角度考察,却并不是越明确越具体越好。实际上,明确与模糊都是相对而言的,限度之内的模糊能够扩充刑法规范的涵摄力,进而为刑法解释提供能动的空间,这也符合诠释学视野下的刑法解释论说。
The language world is a very vague world. From a philosophical point of view, semantic ambiguity is absolute, and clarity is relative, which determines the norms of criminal law based on statutory law also has the characteristics of clarity and ambiguity. The pursuit of criminal law norms specific, but from the perspective of legislative technology, but not the more specific the more specific the better. In fact, both clearness and ambiguity are relative terms. Ambiguity within the limit can expand the force of criminal law norms and provide active space for the interpretation of criminal law, which is in line with the interpretation of criminal law under the perspective of hermeneutics.