论文部分内容阅读
2010年1月14日,北京市第一中级人民法院对“解百纳”商标争议案件做出一审判决,该案件从张裕公司向国家商标局提出注册申请,到北京市第一中级人民法院作出一审判决,前后历时八年,几乎将商标申请过程中所涉及的程序全都走了一遍,但“解百纳”是否可以被确认为注册商标还没有最终的答案。无论最终结果如何,历时八年且并未结束的“解百纳”商标保卫战作为一个商标案件具有启示意义。
On January 14, 2010, the First Intermediate People’s Court of Beijing made a verdict of first instance on the first instance verdict of the dispute over the trademark “Cabernet”, which filed an application for registration with the State Trademark Bureau from Changyu Company to Beijing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court The court made a verdict of first instance, which lasted eight years, almost all of the procedures involved in the trademark application process are gone through, but “Cabernet ” can be recognized as a registered trademark has no final answer. Regardless of the end result, the “Cabernet” trademark warfare, which lasted eight years and did not end, is of revelation as a trademark case.