“价值”这一概念只是对人而言的,没有人也就没有价值的问题发生。撇开客观与主观两方面的语境而单纯地谈论事实与价值问题,只会陷入一种简单的“是或不是”的二值逻辑。事实与价值的关系是多样性的,既有单纯的事实存在,也有关联着价值的事实存在。对语言在认识世界中的中介作用的认识,有助于我们重新理解事实与价值之间的关系,填平在事实与价值之间被人为划定的鸿沟。应当区分开认知、意向和评价三类动词,以及相应的三类判断。有关某个事实的判断是否涉及价值,这在根本上取决于判断者的主观取向。通过对有关事实的思考,人们可以从中引出价值判断。认为事实与价值二分的观点是不恰当的。价值观念的得出可以有两种途径:一种是经由对事实的反思而得出,如李奥帕德的生态伦理学的观念;另一种是通过纯粹理性的思考与观念的演绎而得出,如罗尔斯的正义理念。 The concept of “value” is only for people and no one has no value. Putting aside the context of both objective and subjective issues and simply talking about the facts and values ​​will fall into a simple binary logic of “yes or no”. The relationship between facts and values ​​is diverse, with both mere factual existence and factual existence associated with value. Awareness of the role of language as an intermediary in the world of understanding helps us to re-understand the relationship between facts and values ​​and to bridge the gulf between the facts and values ​​that are artificially delineated. Three types of verbs, such as cognition, intention and evaluation, should be distinguished as well as the corresponding three types of judgments. Judgment on a fact whether the value involved, which basically depends on the judge’s subjective orientation. By thinking about the facts, one can derive value judgments. It is not appropriate to think of the dichotomy between fact and value. There are two ways to derive the concept of value: one is through the reflection on facts, such as the concept of Ecole Ethiopia; the other is through purely rational thinking and concept deduction derived Out, such as Rawls’s concept of justice.