《美术观察》发起“再论书法的当代标准”的讨论,接到约稿,我迟迟没有动笔,一则确实太忙,无暇顾及;二则想不好如何表达自己的观点,如何来看待“书法标准”。坦率而言,我有点惘然。“书法”有“标准”吗?有,又没有。“书法”需要确立“当代标准”吗?需要,又不需要。“书法标准”有变化吗?变,又不变。这确实是我面对这个问题时的第一反应。由此“跳出”了一个题目:“书法标准”的“变”与“不变”。作为一门独一无二、博大精深的传统艺术,中国书法有着自己完备的审美体系和技法规范,从书写到品赏,早已形成了公认的“书法标准”。这套书法标准体 Art Observations initiated a discussion on contemporary standards of calligraphy, and received an appointment. I did not write down yet. One was too busy and too busy to take care of it. Another was how I wanted to express my point of view. Let’s take a look at “calligraphy standard”. To be frank, I’m a little surprised. “Calligraphy ” Have “Standard ”? There, no. “Calligraphy ” need to establish “contemporary standard ”? Need, do not need. “Calligraphy standard ” change? Change, but also change. This is indeed my first response to this question. From this “jump out ” a topic: “calligraphy standard ” “change ” and “unchanged ”. As a unique and profound traditional art, Chinese calligraphy has its own complete aesthetic system and technical norms. From writing to appreciating, it has long been recognized as a “standard of calligraphy.” This calligraphy standard body