上海一消费者在超市购物时,把放有现金的皮包放进超市自动寄存柜内,购物结束后,柜内的皮包竟不翼而飞。该消费者把超市及其上级公司告上法庭,要求被告赔偿经济损失。2002年10月10日,法院一审判决,该消费者的诉讼请求不予支持。这是上海首例由超市自动寄存柜引发的财产损害赔偿纠纷案,法律关系应如何定性? Shanghai, a consumer shopping in the supermarket, the bag put cash into the supermarket automatic locker, the shopping is over, the bag was actually gone. The consumer sued the supermarkets and their superiors to court and asked the defendants to compensate for economic losses. On October 10, 2002, the court ruled in the first instance that the consumer’s claim was not supported. This is Shanghai’s first case of property damage compensation disputes caused by the supermarket automatic deposit counters, the legal relationship should be how to determine?