论文部分内容阅读
1.近年来,各地筹办和建设新(高)技术产业开发区(以下简称开发区)的势头方兴未艾。尽管其发展轨迹呈“驼峰形”,但毕竟由于地方政府的热心支持,发展总算较为顺畅。去年以来,各地“科技兴省(市)”的热潮更是把开发区建设,至少在声势上,推向了一个新的高峰。开发区的热心鼓吹者和支持者,可以举出大量事实来表明业已取得的引人注目的成绩;与之相反,疑惑者甚至反对者,对此则以“形式主义”一说贬之。现在可对说,经过几年来的理论争辩和实践检验,开发区需要在“进”或“退”的十字路口认真思考:开发区建设到底有无必要?该不该加强开发区的建设速度?进一步诘问:开发区仅仅是地方政府的权宜之计,还是振兴我国经济、发展新(高)技术产业的必然选择? 2.对开发区抱疑惑或反对态度者,举出一些事由来证明他们的论断的正确性。他们认为: (1)开发区源于地方政府尤其是省市科委的
1. In recent years, the momentum of organizing and building new (high) technology industrial development zones (hereinafter referred to as “development zones”) in various places is on the rise. Despite its “hump-shaped” trajectory, the development is finally smoother due to the enthusiastic support of local governments. Since last year, the upsurge of “invigorating the province by science and technology (cities)” has pushed the development zone at least to a new peak at least. Enthusiastic advocates and supporters of the TEDA can cite a large number of facts to show the remarkable results they have achieved. On the contrary, confused people and even opponents are “formalist” to this effect. Now it can be said that after several years of theoretical debate and practice tests, the development zone needs to think hard about the crossroads of “entering” or “withdrawing”: is it necessary for the construction of the development zone and should it speed up the development of the zone? Further asked: Are Development Zones just an expedient measure for local governments, or are they inevitable choices for rejuvenating China’s economy and developing new (high) technology industries? 2. Give some examples of doubts or objections to TEDA in proving their The correctness of the judgment. They think: (1) Development Zone from the local government, especially the provincial science and Technology Commission