复合式审前程序破解“案多人少”困局

来源 :北京支部生活 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:xmzh369
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
近年来,随着人们维权意识的不断提高,北京市法院收案量呈逐年上升趋势,“案多人少”的矛盾日益凸显。同时,因受限于传统的立案模式,大量案件进入实体审判程序后因程序性瑕疵被裁定驳回,错过了审判的最佳时机,给维权者造成了不必要损失。自2010年8月起,北京市法院在海淀、丰台、房山和昌平四个区法院开展试点工作,推行起诉登记和适度审查相结合、全程调解指导相辅助的复合式审前程序,有效破解了“案多人少”的 In recent years, with the continuous improvement of people’s awareness of safeguarding their rights, the number of cases received by the courts in Beijing has been on the rise year by year, and the contradiction between “more cases and fewer cases” has become increasingly prominent. At the same time, due to being limited to the traditional filing mode, a large number of cases were ruled out due to procedural flaws after entering substantive trial procedures, missed the best time for trial and caused unnecessary losses to defenders. Since August 2010, the courts in Beijing have conducted pilot projects in four districts of Haidian, Fengtai, Fangshan and Changping, implemented the composite pre-trial procedures that are combined with the registration of prosecutions and appropriate examination and assisted by the entire mediation process, effectively cracking the “Case many people less ”
其他文献
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
期刊
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
期刊
请下载后查看,本文暂不支持在线获取查看简介。 Please download to view, this article does not support online access to view profile.
在经历长期探索和充分论证后,最高人民法院于2010年11月发布了《关于案例指导工作的规定》,这标志着中国特色案例指导制度的初步确立。此后,经最高人民法院审判委员会讨论通
58.9%“奥赛国内获奖取消保送”的消息成为舆论焦点。一项有2346人参加的问卷调查显示,58.9%网友认为应该全部取消高考加分,33%网友认为应该清理部分加分项目,只有8.1%的网友
我国使用契约的历史很长,如从原始社会末年开始使用萌芽状态的契约算起,至民国时期止,已有4000多年了。其间曾使用过的契约总数,大约接近于一个天文数字。可是契约毕竟不是
管辖是指确定同级人民法院或者上下级人民法院之间受理第一审民事案件的分工和权限,是“诉讼的人口”或“诉讼的前奏”。无论是在民事诉讼、行政诉讼还是在刑事诉讼中,管辖的
一、加强学习,充分认识刑事诉讼法修改的重要意义和全面掌握修改的核心内容1.刑事诉讼法修改的重要意义刑事诉讼法在法律体系中具有极其重要的地位,号称小宪法,仅次于宪法,是
在英国法中履行不能规则的地位并不像其在原来的德国债法中那样显赫,而且在英国普通法的资源中也找不到履行不能能够免除或者不免除合同债务的理论依据。所以在履行不能规则