鲁迅作品中的“我”不是鲁迅,似乎已成定论。其实不尽然,许多教师讲课是把“我”与鲁迅对等的。记得上次讲读《故乡》一课时,我采用“我”不是鲁迅的讲法,理由之一,是鲁迅回故乡搬家前经常回家探亲,小说却写“我二十余年未回故乡”分明是虚构,故“我”只能是一个艺术形 The “I” in Lu Xun’s works is not Lu Xun. It seems that it has already been decided. In fact, it is not always the case that many teachers lecture on “I” and Lu Xun. I remember that when I last read “Hometown”, I used “I” not Lu Xun’s teaching method. One of the reasons was that Lu Xun often went home to visit relatives before moving back to his hometown. The novel wrote “I haven’t returned to my hometown for more than 20 years.” Is fictional, so “I” can only be an art form