论文部分内容阅读
机动车交通事故责任纠纷案件的实践中,保险公司对于如何提起重新鉴定常常不知所措。本文以审判实务中所存在的问题为切入点,探讨了重新鉴定启动中的任意性与武断性并存的双重困境,旨在提供一些初步的程序性建构思路。在机动车交通事故责任纠纷案件的审理过程中,面对初次鉴定中的问题异议,多数保险公司选择申请重新鉴定。实务上,法官对是否启动重新鉴定的心证判断一般是不公开的,这令诉讼各方均非常困惑。
In the practice of motor vehicle accident liability dispute cases, insurance companies are often overwhelmed with how to bring a reappraisal. Based on the problems existing in judicial practice, this article explores the double dilemma of coexistence of arbitrariness and arbitrariness in the re-accreditation process. It aims to provide some initial procedural constructive ideas. In the process of hearing a motorcar accident responsibility dispute case, in the face of the initial dissent, the majority of insurance companies choose to apply for re-qualification. In practice, judges are generally not open about whether or not to start the re-appraisal, which makes the parties in the proceedings very confused.