论文部分内容阅读
目的比较阴道彩超与腹部彩超诊断瘢痕子宫妊娠的临床效果。方法 480例瘢痕子宫妊娠患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,各240例。观察组患者采用阴道彩超予以检查操作,对照组患者采用腹部彩超予以检查操作,对两组患者胚芽、附件区包块及诊断符合率等情况进行对比分析。结果观察组诊断符合率(95.42%)高于对照组(79.17%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者胚芽、假孕囊及附件区包块等情况高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针对瘢痕子宫妊娠的临床诊断,采用阴道彩超诊断率明显高于腹部彩超,在临床应用效果方面更为突出。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of vaginal ultrasound and abdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of uterine scar pregnancy. Methods 480 patients with uterine scar pregnancy were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 240 cases each. The patients in the observation group were examined by vaginal ultrasound and the control group were examined by abdominal color Doppler ultrasound. Comparisons were made between the two groups of germ, attachment mass and diagnostic coincidence rate. Results The diagnostic coincidence rate (95.42%) in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (79.17%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). In the observation group, the germ, The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion For the clinical diagnosis of uterine scar pregnancy, the diagnostic rate of vaginal ultrasound is significantly higher than that of abdominal ultrasound, the clinical application of the more prominent.