起诉意见书、起诉书、判决书等法律文书通常都会在结尾部分用“认罪态度较好”“认罪态度恶劣”等简洁语言对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的认罪态度下定论。但由于立法和司法解释未明确认罪态度的认定依据,在司法实践中,少数办案人员对认罪态度认定依据的收集、记录工作重视不足,导致部分案件的认罪态度结论缺乏足够依据。而在司法实践中,认罪态度对程序选择和实体结果都有重要影响。为了减少认定的恣意性,应当 Lawsuits such as indictments, indictments, judgments and other legal instruments usually conclude in the concluding section on the guilty plea of ​​criminal suspects and defendants in concise language such as “good guilty pleas of guilty”, “bad guilty plea of ​​guilty pleas.” However, due to the fact that the legislature and judicial interpretations did not clearly recognize the guilty plea, in the judicial practice, a small number of investigators paid insufficient attention to the collection and recording of the basis for the recognition of guilty plea, resulting in the lack of sufficient basis for the conclusion of the guilty plea in some cases. In judicial practice, the guilty conscientious attitude has an important influence on the choice of procedure and the result of the entity. In order to reduce the arbitrary nature of identification, it should be