论文部分内容阅读
细菌含量超出国外数十倍的原奶,用还是不用?蛋白质含量远低正常标准的原奶,用还是不用?炎症缠身的病体奶牛挤出的原奶,用还是不用?这些疑问本是抛给6月1日正式施行的乳业新国标的,但目前看来恐怕寻找不到答案。经过“三鹿奶粉”事件血的教训,太多人坚信,新国标必将构筑乳业的第一道安全之门。然而,等到千呼万唤的新国标正式颁布,众多专家惊呼:“这简直是一夜退回25年前!”乳蛋白含量从1986年的2.95%,降到了2.8%,菌落总数(细菌含量)则从2003年的每毫升50万调至200万,均为历史新低。另外,关于乳品中三聚氰胺的规定,依旧执行的是2008年临时对三聚氰胺进行限量值的标准,即允许每千克婴儿配方奶粉中的三聚氰胺含量不能超过1毫克。更有甚者,就在乳业新国标才落地之际,含有超标三聚氰胺的毒奶粉卷土重来。这不由得让人反思:国标的作用和意义何在?
The content of bacteria is more than tens of times more than the original raw milk, use or not? The protein content is far lower than the normal standard of raw milk, with or without? Inflamed body cows squeezed out of the original milk, with or not? These questions are thrown June 1 officially implemented the new national standard of the dairy industry, but at present it seems I am afraid I can’t find the answer. After the lesson of the “Sanlu milk powder” incident, too many people are convinced that the new national standard will surely constitute the first security door for the dairy industry. However, after the long-awaited new national standard was formally promulgated, many experts exclaimed: “This is just a night’s return 25 years ago!” The milk protein content has dropped from 2.95% in 1986 to 2.8%, and the total number of bacteria (bacteria The content was adjusted to a record low of 500,000 from 500,000 per milliliter in 2003. In addition, regarding the melamine content in dairy products, the implementation of the melamine limit value standard in 2008 is still implemented, that is, the melamine content per kilogram of infant formula should not exceed 1 mg. What’s more, on the occasion of the new national standard of dairy industry, poisonous milk containing excessive melamine has come back. This cannot help but make people reflect: What is the role and significance of the national standard?