一、引言自19世纪70年代的“边际革命”以来,西方“正统”经济学基本上抛弃了劳动价值论,取而代之的是新古典的均衡价格理论。新古典均衡价格理论经历了一个发展过程,不断演进,但其“硬核”实质上仍是瓦尔拉斯和马歇尔在19世纪70至90年代形成的价格理论。近几年来,随着改革开放,西方经济学的大量舶来,新古典经济学的方法、原理等对我国经济学界产生了影响。新古典的均衡价格理论越来越被一些人接受。当前,许多作家甚至用新古典的均衡价格理论来解释和“改造”马克思的劳动价值理论。造成了学术界的许多混乱。为了正本清源,有利于我国价格理论的健康发展,对新古典均衡价格理论进行客观的批 I. INTRODUCTION Since the “Marginal Revolution” of the 1870s, Western “orthodoxy” has basically abandoned labor theory of value and replaced it with neoclassical equilibrium price theory. The neoclassical equilibrium price theory has undergone a development process and evolved continuously. However, its “hard core” is essentially the price theory formed by Walras and Marshall in the 1970s and 1990s. In recent years, with the reform and opening up, a large number of imported western economics, the methods and principles of neoclassical economics have had an impact on the economics of our country. Neoclassical equilibrium price theory is accepted by some people more and more. At present, many writers even use the neoclassical equilibrium price theory to explain and “reform” Marx's labor value theory. Caused a lot of confusion in academia. In order to clear the original, is conducive to the healthy development of China's price theory, the objective theory of neoclassical equilibrium price theory