论文部分内容阅读
目的比较阴式子宫切除术和传统腹部子宫切除术的治疗效果。方法行子宫切除术的患者按一定的标准进行筛选,收集48例阴式子宫切除术的患者(观察组)和35例传统腹部子宫切除术的患者(对照组),回顾性分析和比较两组病例。结果观察组平均排气时间、平均住院时间及并发症例数均少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论阴式手术更有利于患者术后的恢复、更安全、生活质量也能得到提高。
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of vaginal hysterectomy and traditional abdominal hysterectomy. Methods Hysterectomy patients were screened according to certain criteria. 48 patients with vaginal hysterectomy (observation group) and 35 patients with conventional abdominal hysterectomy (control group) were collected. The clinical data of two groups were retrospectively analyzed and compared Case. Results The mean duration of exhaust, average length of hospital stay and number of complications in the observation group were all less than those in the control group, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion Negative surgery is more conducive to the recovery of patients after surgery, safer, quality of life can be improved.