论文部分内容阅读
以“及物”系列变读为切入点,考察其“变读形式”所处的句法结构跟相平行的用“于/於”作标记的句法结构的异同,据此得出:“去声”的功能是把非必有论元提升至必有论元的常规位置,“于/於”则仅用于标记非必有论元,并不具备提升作用,当然以上是就域内而言。伴随着变读的衰落,这引起了一系列的变化:宾语语义角色的不断扩大、“于/於”在两汉前后的大量消失、“V+受事+与事”双宾结构的形成等。除此之外,亦可见“动词+于/於+必有论元”以表完成体的现象,它跟“于/於”是非必有论元的标记并不矛盾。
Taking the series of “” and “” as a starting point, this paper examines the similarities and differences between the syntactic structures in which the “transliteration ” It is concluded that the function of “go-go” is to elevate the non-essential argument to the regular position of the necessary argument, “/ /” is only used to mark the non-essential argument and does not have the promotion Of course, the above is for the domain. With the decline of change of reading, it caused a series of changes: the semantic role of objects continued to expand, the disappearance of “Yu / Yu” before and after the Han Dynasty and the double object structure of “V + affair + affair” Formed and so on. In addition, we can see that “the verb + / / + must have the element” to complete the phenomenon of the body, which is not “ / in ” is not necessarily an argument argument is not contradictory.